If you’ve ever run your manuscript through Grammarly and thought, Great—this is basically edited now, you’re not alone.
Editing tools are powerful, helpful, and absolutely worth using. I use them myself. But they’re exactly that—tools, not editors.
Here’s a look at my favorite editing tools, what they’re great at, and why none of them can replace a human copyeditor.
1. Spellcheck (Yes, the Basic One)
Let’s start with the classic. Built-in spellcheck is often overlooked, but it’s excellent at catching:
Simple typos
Double words
Missing punctuation
Obvious spelling errors
Why I don’t trust it alone:
Spellcheck can’t understand context. It won’t catch homophones (their/there/they’re), misused words, or sentences that technically work but sound awful.
2. Grammarly
Grammarly is one of the most popular tools for a reason. It’s great for:
Catching grammar and punctuation issues
Flagging passive voice
Spotting wordiness
Helping non-native English writers
Why I don’t trust it alone:
Grammarly often “corrects” things that are stylistic choices—especially dialogue, creative sentence fragments, or voice-driven prose. Blindly accepting suggestions can flatten your writing fast.
3. ProWritingAid
ProWritingAid is a favorite among fiction writers. It excels at:
Identifying repeated words and phrases
Highlighting sentence length variety
Spotting pacing issues
Offering style-based reports
Why I don’t trust it alone:
It generates a lot of feedback—some of it helpful, some of it unnecessary. Without experience, it’s easy to over-edit and strip away voice.
4. Hemingway Editor
Hemingway focuses on readability and clarity by:
Flagging long or complex sentences
Highlighting adverbs and passive voice
Assigning readability scores
Why I don’t trust it alone:
Not all good writing is “simple.” Literary, emotional, or nuanced prose often needs complexity. Hemingway can push everything toward the same blunt, minimal style.
5. Style Guides & Checklists
Tools don’t always come with software. Style guides (like Chicago or AP) and editing checklists are invaluable for:
Consistency
Formatting rules
Industry standards
Why I don’t trust them alone:
Rules can conflict, evolve, or need interpretation. A human editor knows when to follow the rule—and when to break it.
So…Why Use Editing Tools at All?
Because they’re fantastic at:
Speeding up the editing process
Catching surface-level errors
Helping writers revise more confidently
I often encourage writers to use tools before hiring an editor. A cleaner manuscript allows the editor to focus on clarity, flow, and nuance instead of fixing obvious errors. This can also decrease the cost because your editor will have to spend less time on your manuscript.
Why Human Editors Still Matter
Editing tools can’t:
Understand tone, voice, or intention
Evaluate dialogue realism
Track character development
Spot inconsistencies across chapters
Make judgment calls about style
They don’t know your audience.
They don’t know your goals.
They don’t know when breaking a rule is the right choice.
A human editor does.
The Best Approach: Tools + Human Expertise
The strongest manuscripts come from a combination of:
Smart tool usage
Careful self-revision
Professional editing
Think of editing tools as your first line of defense—not the final authority.
If you want help polishing your manuscript beyond what software can offer, I’m happy to help. Tools can catch errors, but an editor helps your writing shine.